These FAQs were developed by the union in concert with the Public Services Committee of the ICTU and will provide you with valuable insights to consider as you form your opinions on the implications of the proposals.
The INTO will provide additional detailed information to every member before the balloting process, which will take place from 4-14 March inclusive. We will regularly update our website and inform members on the proposed agreement through our various communications channels in the next month.
Your questions answered
What is the duration of the agreement?
Has the INTO taken a position on the proposed agreement?
INTO members will ultimately decide whether or not the union will back the new agreement. This will be done through a national ballot from 4-14 March inclusive.
What are the pay terms?
2024
• A general round increase in annualised basic salary for all public servants of 2.25% or €1,125, whichever is greater, from 1 January 2024
• A general round increase in annualised basic salary for all public servants of 1% on 1 June 2024
• A general round increase in annualised basic salary for all public servants of 1% or €500, whichever is greater, on 1 October 2024.
2025
• A general round increase in annualised basic salary for all public servants of 2% or €1,000, whichever is greater, on 1 March 2025
• A general round increase in annualised basic salary for all public servants of 1% on 1 August 2025
2026
• A general round increase in annualised basic salary for all public servants of 1% or €500, whichever is greater, on 1 February 2026
• A general round increase in annualised basic salary for all public servants of 1% on 1 June 2026.
The pay proposals are estimated to be worth up to 10.75% for a new entrant teacher. This is because the flat-rate elements of the pay deal are worth more to public servants earning below €50,000 per annum.
For INTO members earning €50,000 or more per annum the salary increases accrue to 9.62% by 1 June 2026.
If the proposed agreement is accepted, unions will not be able to lodge any ‘cost-increasing’ claims for improvements in pay or conditions during the lifetime of the agreement. However, there are specific provisions for local bargaining and small claims may be processed.
What is meant by local bargaining?
Detailed arrangements for local bargaining are to be agreed by the 30th of June this year. Local negotiations could then take place between July 2024 and June 2025. To the greatest extent possible agreements would be secured through direct negotiations.
This process will provide opportunities for specific groups, grades and categories to deal with issues of particular concern, including structural changes, and to have those addressed through the additional 3% secured under the terms of the new agreement.
While 1% is payable of 1 September 2025, the remaining balance of 2% will be due to be implemented during the term of the next successor agreement. The local bargaining fund for INTO members is circa €100 million of which €33 million would be applied from 1 September 2025.
The final details for arrangements for local bargaining are to be agreed by 30 June 2024, what information can be given to the membership regarding the local bargaining process prior to voting on the deal?
1% of the total primary payroll (€33 million) can be used to address a number of claims for primary teachers, with a further 2% (€67 million) committed for the same purpose in the following agreement, which would commence on 1 July 2026.
Issues aimed at standardising certain terms and conditions across grades and sectors of the public service will be excluded from local bargaining, including: overtime rates; weekly hours of attendance; sick leave entitlements; and pension arrangements.
The INTO will consult with members regarding their priorities for local bargaining in April and May and we will liaise with fellow education unions.
Following these consultations the CEC will decide in June which claims to lodge in July 2024.
Negotiations with DE concerning INTO claims will take place between July 2024 and June 2025. The parties will endeavour, to the greatest extent possible, to reach agreement through direct negotiation.
Where agreement cannot be reached and local engagement has been fully exhausted, the matters of disagreement will proceed to conciliation at the Teachers’ Conciliation Council.
DE will be required to verify with DPENDPR the costings and policy impacts of INTO claims being agreed to progress during the lifetime of the proposed new agreement prior to the first payment date for local bargaining of 1 September 2025.
Do the pay improvements apply to allowances?
What modernisation and reform measures are in the package?
An appendix on the education reform agenda includes:
• Primary Curriculum change.
• Strategies – Literacy and Numeracy; Digital, STEM, Modern Foreign Language; Gaeltacht education.
• Policies – Education for Sustainable Development, Cineáltas Anti-Bullying Plan.
• Engagement between union officials and the Department of Education on the review of the EPSEN Act and on the outcome of policy advice on Inclusive Education.
Did discussion on the removal of Croke Park hours take place during negotiations on this agreement?
- that any new agreement would address the rising cost of living, especially for low-to middle- earners,
- that it would contain provisions to allow for the normalisation of industrial relations,
- that it would contain a measure to stabilise the agreement through the inclusion of a local bargaining clause, and
- that proposals for future proofing public services would be considered.
The 19 ICTU unions, all of whose members are still obliged to do Croke Park hours, did not include the removal of these hours as a central aspect of the framework for negotiations. However, the INTO does intend to engage with the Department of Education to seek a more flexible approach to the use of these hours.
Is there a ‘no strike’ clause?
Did discussion on the removal of Croke Park hours take place during negotiations on this agreement?
• that any new agreement would address the rising cost of living, especially for low-to middle- earners,
• that it would contain provisions to allow for the normalisation of industrial relations,
• that it would contain a measure to stabilise the agreement through the inclusion of a local bargaining clause, and
• that proposals for future proofing public services would be considered.
The 19 ICTU unions, all of whose members are still obliged to do Croke Park hours, did not include the removal of these hours as a central aspect of the framework for negotiations. However, the INTO does intend to engage with the Department of Education to seek a more flexible approach to the use of these hours.
What happens if the economic and fiscal situation changes?
What are the implications for public service pensioners?
What happens if the proposed agreement is rejected?
Union negotiators advised affiliate unions last month that the pay terms of the new agreement represented the “absolute maximum achievable” through negotiations at this time, and are the outcome of a challenging negotiations process. Union negotiators don’t believe it would be possible to achieve a better outcome by agreement.
In the event of a rejection of the proposals, consideration would need to be given to a campaign of industrial action aimed at securing better terms.
What happens next?
The ICTU Public Service Committee (PSC) represents all 19 ICTU-affiliated unions with members in the civil and public service. It decides through a weighted aggregate of the outcomes of all the union ballots, which means the voting strength of each union is determined by the number of members it has in the civil and public service.
Should the proposed agreement be ratified on 25 March it would be anticipated that the first payment of 2.25% or €1125 (whichever is greater)
would be made to primary teachers in late April or early May 2024 backdated to 1 January 2024.
Read the full text of the proposed agreement.
It’s never been more important – or easier – to get the protections and benefits of union membership. Join INTO HERE.
What is FEMPI and why does repealing it matter?
This legislation is known as FEMPI, which stands for Financial Emergency Measures in the Public Interest (No 2) Act 2009. The vast majority of FEMPI measures have now been repealed, however some elements remain in place.
Section 4 of this legislation centralised control in the Department of Public Expenditure, NDP Delivery, and Reform (DPENDPDR) to an excessive extent. This was stopping ordinary industrial relations from progressing, even when there was agreement between employers and unions. Before section 4 was introduced, public bodies could decide to increase pay with the consent of the appropriate Minister and the approval of the Finance Minister.
With this level of central control being exerted by one Department the statutory system of industrial relations, including the Workplace Relations Commission, the Labour Court, and even in some instances, conciliation and arbitration schemes, couldn’t work as they are meant to.
Getting rid of what remains of FEMPI would allow industrial relations to return to pre-recession norms.
In November the Minister indicated that he would commit to the repeal of section 4(2) of the Financial Emergency Measures in the Public Interest (No 2) Act 2009 (FEMPI), in the context of the agreement and ratification of a multi-annual pay agreement. The union side had made it clear that without this commitment its focus would be on a shorter deal.
The government side has said it will move fast on its commitment to repealing section 4(2) following ratification of the proposed agreement.
The proposed agreement contains a simplified dispute resolution process compared to Building Momentum with clearer roles for the Workplace Relations Commission and the Labour Court (or Conciliation and Arbitration schemes where appropriate). This will also contribute to the normalisation of industrial relations.